A federal judge ruled that Apple may access OpenAI's interview material with former Apple employees. The order also covers private messages and depositions from key people in the case. Apple accuses OpenAI of misappropriating trade secrets through its hiring. The ruling adds pressure on OpenAI as the case moves forward.
What it means: The judge allowing Apple to access OpenAI's interview material with former Apple employees, along with private messages and depositions, significantly raises the stakes for OpenAI, because that evidence could show exactly what was discussed during hiring and whether confidential knowledge changed hands. Competition for talent in artificial intelligence and hardware is so intense that engineers moving between large companies are increasingly followed by legal disputes, and each case shapes practice across the sector. It should be stressed that the ruling concerns access to evidence and not the substance of the allegations, which have not been decided. For any company hiring from competitors, even at a far smaller scale, the lesson is practical: it needs a documented process showing that a new employee brings no documents, code or information from a previous employer, together with clear confidentiality terms from the very first day, so that hiring good people does not turn into an expensive legal dispute later.
Read the original on TechCrunch
Related service: Custom software