The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Justice Department filed a lawsuit in federal court on 26 October against the state of Utah and its attorney general, Derek Brown. They seek to block enforcement of state gambling law against Kalshi and other CFTC-regulated prediction markets. They want a court declaration that federal law takes precedence and an injunction barring state investigations or prosecutions over these trades. Utah has charged Kalshi with illegal gambling.
What it means: The dispute turns on a basic question: are contracts on the outcome of events, such as elections or sports matches, financial derivatives supervised by the federal CFTC, or bets regulated by the states? The answer will decide whether prediction markets can operate across the US under one federal licence or whether each state can ban them. A regulator and the Justice Department going to court to protect a private platform is unusual and shows how politicised the issue has become. Kalshi and its competitors have grown rapidly, and companies such as Robinhood now earn significant revenue from such contracts. In Greece, bets on the outcome of events fall under gambling law and the Hellenic Gaming Commission, and require a specific licence. Greek businesses or users who come across such platforms should know that US federal supervision does not make them legal here. The case also shows how financial and gambling law can collide when a product fits neatly into neither.
Related service: myDATA integrations
Related stories
- OCC issues examiner framework for banks’ use of super intelligence
- FCA PS26/21 streamlines UK EMIR intragroup exemptions from 1 January 2027
- Block discloses DOJ AML agreement in principle with $764M payment
- AADE Phase B expands digital tracking of goods movements from 2027/2028
- CFTC clears a path for equity perpetual futures on registered exchanges